As we blend into crowds, our individuality fades, replaced by a collective consciousness. This phenomenon, known as deindividuation1, can lead us down paths we'd never tread alone.
From the shared euphoria at a rock concert2 to the unity in a peaceful protest, the camaraderie at a sports event, and even the spark that ignites mob violence, groups can foster both the best and worst in us. They can breed racism, but they can also birth civil rights movements. The key lies in understanding the dynamics of how the group operates.
So, what's the real danger of crowds? It's not the number of people, but our lack of awareness and understanding of their influence.
To help you explore this further - Here are 8 thought experiments (or a series of get-to-know you questions for first dates). Each one is designed to stimulate your thinking about crowd psychology.
The Concert Experiment: Imagine you're at a concert, and everyone starts clapping to the beat. Do you join in? What does it take for you to do it even when undesirable?
The Elevator Experiment: If everyone in an elevator faces the back, would you turn around too? What drives your decision?
The Social Media Experiment: Scroll through your social media feed. Do you find yourself liking posts because they already have many likes? What’s going to motivate you to be more discerning?
The Protest Experiment: If you were part of a peaceful protest that suddenly turned violent, what would you do? How would you maintain a peaceful stance?
The Opinion Experiment: Think of a time when you changed your opinion to match the majority. Especially when you lacked sufficient knowledge on the topic and wanted to remain unsure and hold out for longer? Why did you do it?
The Joke Experiment: Have you ever laughed at a joke you didn't find funny because everyone else was laughing? It is amazing how often people laugh at uninteresting crap just to win social approval (see my review of Dr. Robert Provine’s laughter research).
The Queue Experiment: Would you join a long queue without knowing what it's for, just because others are in line?
The Silence Experiment: In a group discussion, if everyone falls silent after someone shares an idea, do you break the silence or go along with the group? Pay attention to that internal mental chatter next time it happens and see if you can go in the direction you want (read Ethan Kross’ book Chatter for more).
These experiments aren't just hypothetical scenarios. They're reflections of our daily interactions, highlighting the subtle yet powerful influence of the crowd. By becoming more aware of this influence, we can make more conscious decisions, ensuring we're not cowardly conformists, but individuals who think, act, and choose for ourselves.
In the end, the crowd is a force we can harness for good, if we approach them with a firm grip on our individuality. Let's not fear the crowd, but learn to navigate it, one conscious decision at a time.
Provocation
Ask the thought experiments above to one of your friends. And if you have a kid, get their answers as well. Be sure to do it in person so you can notice the non-verbal cues. See how long it takes them to respond and whether you think they answered honestly or tried to present themselves as immune to social influences (when the truth is probably far murkier). I'll let you know how my three daughters responded in the comment section....
If you enjoyed this newsletter, please leave a ❤️. Better yet, support my work as a paid subscriber.
And if you want to meet for an individual meeting about anything including science, writing, well-being, college, mentoring, consultation, or life advice, click here to sign up.
Dr. Todd B. Kashdan is an author of several books including The Art of Insubordination: How to Dissent and Defy Effectively (Avery/Penguin) and Professor of Psychology and Leader of The Well-Being Laboratory at George Mason University.
Connect on: Twitter or Facebook or Linkedin or Instagram
Read Past Issues Here Including:
You might not have known that Dr. Happiness began with this line of work. We will excuse the authors for spelling Dr. Ed Diener’s name wrong. And btw, if you don’t know him, do read this article by his son Robert and me on 3 Lessons From His Research (download it, read it, pass is on - there’s no quicker route to great work than dissecting the best).
There are concerts and then there is this one - where I met Eddie Vedder and Chris Cornell back stage.
Wow and fascinating! Have never seen a breakdown of crowd behavior like this before. So interesting to think about how these different styles have evolved (for the better on every one I hope) through the years. And good fodder for conversations with others moving forward...
The laughing one I’ll probably always struggle with a little bit. Unless something is super-weird or off-color, sometimes I’ll at least smile. It’s largely my “taking care of others” issue around which I’m SO much better in my middle years. Being a part of others’ laughter and amusement is one of my favorite things, and I’m okay with a soft smile or slight chuckle, but no longer exaggerate my response around something I don’t find funny or that funny. And not sure it’s even one I want to progress on that much...(something to think about more, though, for sure!).
I’m curious about any reasons where one might not still offer a “kind” smile or chuckle? Other than needing to be curious about what they said or dissent with what they said...
Thanks. I’m a bit obsessed with person-situation contingencies right now. I can think of lots of situations where we don’t smile simply because it’s not funny and crowd be damned. This just happened to me multiple times at a comedy club on Friday. There was often appreciation but without a compulsion to smile or laugh. Or just individual differences in humor. Cool to watch.